Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Freedom of Information (FOI) Act request ref: 01/FIN/25/003157/Z
Version Date: 13/05/2025
The Road Safety Department have provided the following information.
Speed camera A348 Ringwood road
Could you please confirm that these records are correct from your database .
Activations for the fixed speed camera at A348 from February 2024 to October 2024
February 231 activations
March 1960 activations
April 1568 activations
May 1605 activations
June 1494 activations
July 1545 activations
August 1427 activations
September 1252 activations
October 1159 activations
Totalling 12241 activations in 9 months
I reviewed it from someone who works for Dorset Road Safe
It is not possible to confirm that the figures you provided are correct as you haven’t told us exactly how these figures have been sourced, aside from someone working for Dorset Road Safe.
The reports have been run again and resulted in the below tables.
Table 1 shows figures where rejected offences have not been removed. These show the closest to the number of activations. These figures include rejected offences - where the camera has activated but for one reason or another the offence cannot be prosecuted and so no Notice of Intended Prosecution has been issued.
Table 2 shows the closest reproduction of your figures. The results were exported to Excel where rejections were removed, and blanks were removed from the field indicating a Notice of Intended Prosecution had been issued. This is most likely how the figures you sent were produced.
The figures were taken from the Notice Management Reporting Software.
Table 1
|
Month |
Activations |
|
Feb |
245 |
|
Mar |
2048 |
|
Apr |
1614 |
|
May |
1664 |
|
Jun |
1548 |
|
Jul |
1597 |
|
Aug |
1512 |
|
Sep |
1331 |
|
Oct |
1243 |
|
Total |
12802 |
Table 2
|
Month |
Activations |
|
Feb |
231 |
|
Mar |
1961 |
|
Apr |
1570 |
|
May |
1605 |
|
Jun |
1495 |
|
Jul |
1545 |
|
Aug |
1427 |
|
Sep |
1254 |
|
Oct |
1160 |
|
Total |
12248 |